It’s time to end the Medicare-Medicaid merry-go-round, says Dr. Rachel M. Werner

Consider the challenges faced by those entangled in the complex web of the American healthcare system, particularly among the economically disadvantaged, elderly, and often disabled individuals who are dually covered by both Medicare and Medicaid.

It might seem logical that having dual insurance coverage would offer twice the support, but in reality, these two programs were not designed to work in harmony. Instead, they function independently, resulting in a confusing array of rules and incentives that lead to cost-shifting between them, leaving patients without adequate care.

For those with dual eligibility, bureaucratic obstacles are a daily reality. For instance, imagine a woman in her thirties with spina bifida whose electric wheelchair broke down in the busy streets of New York City. She found herself caught in a frustrating cycle: Medicaid insisted she seek aid from Medicare first, knowing well that Medicare wouldn't cover the replacement. Only after Medicare's rejection did Medicaid reluctantly consider her request. This ordeal dragged on for 20 distressing months, during which she suffered discomfort and health complications due to an inadequate makeshift chair.

In another case, an elderly man endured years of soft food diets because his dentures were lost amid coverage issues during transitions between multiple rehabilitation centers, with neither Medicare nor Medicaid willing to cover replacements.

Similarly, a stroke survivor encountered barriers to accessing rehabilitation while facing steep Medicare copays that Medicaid should have covered. Even her policy-savvy niece struggled to navigate the intricate requirements of the system.

If those at the pinnacle of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) struggle to navigate this labyrinth, what hope remains for others?

These narratives encapsulate the plight of nearly 13 million dually eligible individuals, most of whom earn less than $20,000 annually. Despite costing the government over half a trillion dollars annually, these individuals, burdened by disabilities and advanced age, often receive inadequate care due to the disjointed nature of Medicare and Medicaid.

The crux of the issue lies in the disjointed operation of these two programs. Federal law dictates that Medicaid foots the bill only as a last resort, after exhausting all other options, while Medicare's inflexible regulations often fail to adapt to changing healthcare needs.

As the complexities of navigating these systems mount, private companies have inundated the market with Medicare plans that resemble one another but offer minimal integration with Medicaid.

To tackle these challenges, bipartisan initiatives have been launched. Senator Bill Cassidy's proposed legislation seeks to establish a roster of integrated plans for states to choose from, incentivizing coordination between Medicare and Medicaid and ensuring financial responsibility. Meanwhile, Senator Robert Casey's bill suggests allocating funds to CMS and states to develop integrated plans, enhancing federal support for integration efforts.

Moving forward, decision-makers must prioritize three principles: placing integrated coverage at the forefront of individual experiences, aligning financial incentives across both programs, and empowering dually eligible individuals with informed choices.

While the journey towards comprehensive, patient-centered care for dually eligible patients is beset with obstacles, there is hope in the mutual acknowledgment of the problem and the bipartisan dedication to finding solutions. By proceeding thoughtfully and prioritizing quality care over financial gain, we can pave the way for significant improvements in the healthcare landscape. _ This narrative stems from Rachel M. Werner's viewpoint, who serves as the Executive Director of the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics at the University of Pennsylvania. In addition to being a Professor of Medicine and holding the Robert D. Eilers Professorship in Health Care Management and Economics, she also practices as a physician at the Philadelphia VA.

Leave a reply